UK Bike.com
THE UK'S LEADING MOTORCYCLE REVIEW SITE
Home |  Bikes For Sale |  Parts & Accessories |  Place An Ad |  Members |  Reviews |  Forum

UK Bike Forum
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        


12»»

Situation Change - What Bike to Purchase Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 14th July 2009 14:55
Junior Member

Junior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 15th July 2009 08:14
Posts: 11, Visits: 33
Hi all,

It is a while since I posted as I got sent away with work and never fulfilled my intent to purchase a bike.

Now I require advise on what bike to purchase.

The bike will be used to get me from London to Manchester on a Friday and return on a Sunday. So bearing in mind the roads (mostly motorway) and mileage and my virtually nil experience of riding, it would be appreciated if you experienced riders can give me some advice on the bike to purchase.

My Budget maximum would be £3k.

An additional question Id like an answer to is, is there a bike that could do the journey non stop i.e without refueling, the mileage is just short of 200 miles. Following on from that, is it wise to do a journey of that distance on those roads non stop or is a stop recommended.

Grateful for your input.

Regards Johnty

Post #3818
Posted 14th July 2009 16:55


Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 16th May 2010 15:09
Posts: 637, Visits: 1,168
Hello and welcome again.

I'm assuming you've got a full and unrestricted license - that's not a journey I'd care to make on a sub-33bhp bike very often!

Easy answer first - you don't have to stop if you don't want to: it's not an astronomical distance and usually bikes don't inflict "asleep at the wheel" syndrome in the same ways cars do. Regardless, you should always stop if you do get tired, start to ache or if the weather's unkind and you feel way too cold (or hot). I probably would plan for a break anyway, though: motorways are boring, and a coffee and a smoke makes them a little more bearable, plus it takes away the need to make the haul without refuelling.

There are plenty of bikes which will do that kind of distance (especially at motorway-ish steady speeds) without a refill - just steer clear of the more obvious high-performance sports machinery, as a rule. I'd worry less about that than about comfortable riding position and weather protection, personally.

Equally, I wouldn't worry too much about limited riding experience as regards bike choice either - any and all decent sized multis will be quite big, hefty and with power to spare. Again, best avoid the most obvious sports machinery and aim for a torquey, less-outright-power tourer type. You could go for something like a ZZR600 at the small end of the market, but middleweight engines tend to be that much more buzzy and vibey - that can become quite uncomfortable over long distance. So I'd probably opt for a last-generation litre(plus) sports-tourer. From personal experience, I'd say the Yamaha Thunderace represents incredible value for money as an excellent all-rounder, as does the Suzuki RF900. If those are a bit too sporty in terms of riding position, or too costly for insurance, you might want to consider something like an early Triumph Sprint, or a Honda VFR800 (if there's one available within budget), or possibly an "adventure" style bike like a BMW GS. There can be some bargains to be had from the local plod: usually Honda STs or BMW Ks - the cops pick them especially because you can spend all day in the saddle - and often auction them off at replacement time. Black Dog can tell you a little more about that!

Have you got any ideas/preferences about what you might be interested in: it's a whole lot easier to make sensible recommendations with a few guidelines to work from?

>> ex silens nox noctis <<

Post #3819
Posted 14th July 2009 20:28


Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 23rd August 2010 20:19
Posts: 1,002, Visits: 1,795
Hi Jonty! Nice to see you back.

I'd agree with pretty much all that is said above. For those distances (and in all weathers) I would say a decent fairing is essential. The difference on even a short ride between being exposed to the wind and weather and having a cocoon to get behind is amazing, and may make the difference between 'wow, I've got to ride home' and 'oh b*gger, do I have to ride home?'.

Most medium to large bikes will have a range of between 150 and 200 miles on a tank, but I will disagree with m'learned friend above and say that I would not ride for longer then about two hours without a break. I can do four in a car if I have the right tunes on, I'm in the mood and I don't need a pee. But a bike takes so much more concentration that I need a break much sooner. Mind you, I am over 50 now, and perhaps a younger person may not find that so much. But getting into the 'get there at all costs' frame of mind can be dangerous. A break for a coffee and a walk around can be a life saver. Doing it this way also means that you are not worrying about your tank range - trying to work out if you can make it to the next services on the fuel you have left is not good for confidence or concentration. Just fill up when you can and go with the flow. Ten minutes here or there is nothing - the chance of a couple of decent bike rides once a week is reward enough

One thing's for sure. Motorway riding does not needs a sports bike - in fact, anything but. The riding position may be ideal for fast, twisty roads, but what you need is something with a long wheelbase, stability and torque rather then top-end power. I would choose the Pan for this any day of the week (you could get an 1100 at this price - a 1300 for 3 grand would be a dog) but bear in mind it is big and heavy. If you're not all that experienced, you may fond the sheer bulk of them a bit intimidating. Pushing them around car parks is not for wimps, that's for sure. The Honda Deauville is well made and reliable, if a little unexciting, so I am told, and would suit your needs. The ZZR600 (a bike I have actually ridden) is quick and comfy, and you could certainly get one within budget. Suzuki's GSX600F and 750F are very under-rated (and therefore cheap) and would do you well. I had the 750 and it was good at everything except showing you what was behind you - my shoulders were too broad for the mirrors. Or perhaps an older bike, such as a BMW K750 or 1000 - good weather protection, go for ever, bulletproof, but again a little unglamorous.

You haven't mentioned if you will be carrying anything. A bike with built-in luggage (such as the Deauville) will make carting your stuff around much easier. Perhaps you can find one with hard luggage in as part of the deal. Private sales often go with a grand's worth of hard cases thrown in, for only a couple of hundred more on the price. And if you plan to ride through winter, heated grips are a Godsend.

Let us know how you get on.

--

2003 ST1300 Pan Euro
1995 Yam XT600E
http://goingfastgettingnowhere.blogspot.com/
Post #3822
Posted 15th July 2009 08:04
Junior Member

Junior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 15th July 2009 08:14
Posts: 11, Visits: 33
Thank you very much to you both for your advise, that as certainly give me a wide selection to look at and wet my appetite.

I must admit the large (above 1000cc) bikes tends to unerve me a little as I mentioned my experience is virtually nil; to the extent i passed my test back in 1990 since then I spent a short time (4 months) with the Armstrong and then about 6 months with KR1s but nothing since 1994.

So pretty much 15 years without getting on a bike, a refresher course will be needed I imagine.

In answer to the two questions.

I passed my test in 1990 so I am unrestricted

I will be carrying a small amount of luggage, was thinking about puitting a bergan on my back? is this wise?

Thank you again guys.

Post #3823
Posted 15th July 2009 21:41


Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 23rd August 2010 20:19
Posts: 1,002, Visits: 1,795
I came back to two wheels a few years ago, after 12 years off, so I know where you are coming from. I would strongly advise a refresher course - swallow your pride and use it to ease yourself back in. I'm sure I would have got my 'bike head' back on quicker if I had, but I'm a bull-headed old git and I don't like to be told anything by anybody! I turned down a free 'returning biker' training day, which was foolish, looking back.

From your experience, I'd go for a middleweight, say a 600 or 750. Easy to handle, not too intimidating, but will do the job for you, and if you feel the need for more in a year or so, you'll know what you want much better.

Carrying stuff in a rucksack is OK for short distances, but over a couple of hundred miles I would think it would get a bit tiring. If that's all you have, strap it to the pillion with a couple of bungees. Job done.

--

2003 ST1300 Pan Euro
1995 Yam XT600E
http://goingfastgettingnowhere.blogspot.com/
Post #3827
Posted 16th July 2009 00:00


Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 16th May 2010 15:09
Posts: 637, Visits: 1,168
Fair enough, if you're not comfortable with the idea of a bigger bike. They're not necessarily that much more edgy or difficult to ride than a middleweight (some are extremely tractable) but most of this biking lark is all about what you feel comfortable with at the time. So best not to put any kind of undue pressure on yourself with any nagging doubts about the bike!

In the sub-litre market, I would look for either a Suzuki GSX750-F, a later model Honda VFR750 (the 95-97 models were the best) or an early VFR800 (the 750's probably a better option, though).

I have owned a ZZR600 and in all honesty wouldn't recommend it highly. Good engine, but poorly finished and none too durable in weather (any kind of weather).

Honda NTV/Deauville is also a good choice, maybe an older Yamaha Thundercat, a pre-FI Honda CBR600F or a Suzuki RF600 if you want to stick around the true middleweight end of the market. Best sling a leg across them in a dealers, though, to get an idea of whether you're comfortable with the riding position. But any of those should come in under budget and will handle the distance.

Rucksacks are rather like not taking breaks over long distance: you can do it, but I personally wouldn't. Cargo net'll hold most small things: if the budget runs to it, a tail pack is slightly nicer. Avoid top boxes at all costs - they just ruin your handling - and if you feel the need for panniers, they should really be fixed/hard type: throwovers all too often end up sailing backwards down the motorway...! I'm not keen on tank bags myself, but some people do like them.

Good hunting, let us know if you find anything!

>> ex silens nox noctis <<

Post #3829
Posted 17th July 2009 10:04


Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 23rd August 2010 20:19
Posts: 1,002, Visits: 1,795
Ah, you have reignited the top-box controversy!

I don't particularly like them, but that's more from a style point of view - they are the biking equivalent of socks and sandals. But they are bloody useful, and I can't say I've ever noticed a bad effect on handling on any bike I have ridden. (I am more a tourer/trailie chap rather than a FireBlade type, and maybe that's why.) I got a cheap top-box off ebay for the XT and it's the must useful acessory I have. The ability to just open it up and sling all your shopping, newspapers, spare bungees, waterproofs etc in there is really handy. Not forgetting somewhere to put your lid and gloves when you need both hands for something off the bike (I meant shopping, but it could apply to all sorts.) Even fully loaded with a week's shopping, there is no noticeable effect on the handling, which, to be fair, is fairly wobbly in any case.

I would agree, though, that hard panniers are the ideal. But my top box was £30 - you won't get hard panniers for less than ten times that,

--

2003 ST1300 Pan Euro
1995 Yam XT600E
http://goingfastgettingnowhere.blogspot.com/
Post #3833
Posted 17th July 2009 16:46


Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 16th May 2010 15:09
Posts: 637, Visits: 1,168
We can do controversy!

To be fair, I have only used top-boxes on sportier-style bikes and they were dreadful. There was one fitted to the TDM when I bought it, but I junked that straightaway because the mountings were in such a state - otherwise it might have been OK. As with your XT, the handling's quite wobbly at the best of times!

The effects on sportsbikes, in my experience, were twofold: disruption to the aerodynamics and having weight a long way back from the rider position. That  made the back end push around in any kind of a breeze and had the front feel skittish all the time. Absolutely hated it: on a bad day it really felt like having a flat rear tyre.

£30's definitely worth a suck-it-and-see experiment, buying a new box and all the mounting gear works out as a rather more expensive way of finding out whether you like having one. Although, I did see a fairly good article (Performance Bikes, I think it was) once where they converted the rear seat pad into a top-box mounting and hence had the box sitting where a pillion would normally be. Apparently it worked very well, but obviously only with a split-seat (ie full sports) bike.

>> ex silens nox noctis <<

Post #3836
Posted 17th July 2009 17:39


Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 1st October 2010 17:26
Posts: 93, Visits: 281
I am a panniers fan myself. When I've had to go away for work I've packed a weeks worth of kit and laptop & shoes (I am a girl we can't help but pack loads). I got a pair that you can extend should you need more space. Attaches under the seat & bungee's and had no problems with them. Not tried the hard one yet, but I don't have a problem with the fabric ones at all.

I've known people who have taken the bike down whilst dismounting and catching the top box.

Post #3838
Posted 17th July 2009 21:23


Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 23rd August 2010 20:19
Posts: 1,002, Visits: 1,795
Hehehehe - yup, been there, etc. With the top box in place, mounting the XT is a whole new set of exercises.

There's a guy on the XT forum I read who has built his own rack for overlanding, which puts a top-box over the pillion seat (which is fairly rudimentary on an XT anyway) and then extends over the back wheel for light stuff like sleeping bags. It looks the real deal. When you think about it, a top-box isn't going to affect weight distribution any more than having a pillion, but the air-resistance thing I can understand. Loading more weight onto the back of the XT just makes the front wheel wave about more than usual, but with a sports bike, loading the rear can have all sorts of undesirable consequances. Of course, on the XT, the box is in the area behind an upright rider, so it's not out in the breeze in the way it would be on a sports bike with a rider crouched down.

I've heard plenty of horror stories about throw-over panniers (falling off, catching fire on the exhaust, etc) but also plenty of people (lke Wilf) who have no problems at all. Perhaps it's all down to how carefully you do it. Many of the overlander guys prefer soft panniers to those hard aluminium cases, as in a get-off, soft panniers will tend to protect the bike, whereas hard panniers are more likely to injure the rider or damage the bike's frame. Just a thought.

--

2003 ST1300 Pan Euro
1995 Yam XT600E
http://goingfastgettingnowhere.blogspot.com/
Post #3840
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

12»»

Reading This Topic Expand / Collapse
Active Users: 1 (1 guest, 0 members, 0 anonymous members)
No members currently viewing this topic.

Permissions Expand / Collapse

All times are GMT, Time now is 7:36pm

Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.1.3 © 2012
Execution: 1.188. 10 queries. Compression Disabled.