|
|
|
Forum Guru
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 24th September 2009 10:49
Posts: 67,
Visits: 198
|
|
Black Dog (17/06/2009) Nice one, Trick. Thank You! Black Dog (17/06/2009)
I obviously belong to the generation before the esteemed Endo. In my day, a car licence acted as a provisional licence for a bike, and you could ride anything up to 250cc on L-plates. No passengers (unless full bike licence) but you could do this for ever if you wanted, without ever taking a test. No CBT - just get on and ride until you felt ready for the test. I did it all on a Honda C70, and by the time of my test had done thousands of miles with L-plates on, including several crossings of the Pennines. The test was a breeze - round the block one way (doing right turns), then the other way (doing left turns), emergency stop, a few questions on the Highway Code, and Robert was your mother's brother. The examiner was standing by the roadside, so you were out of sight of him for at least 50% of the test. . I wish it was like that still, would make my life one hell of a lot easier and cheaper. But hey ho that the way it goes. I wonder what it will be like in another 30 years time? With human evolution... it may be only clarevoyants that can drive as you must be able to pre-empt every manouver of every road user for 1 mile in front (minimum). Thats just for the provisional. Fair enough young people die on motorbikes, but they have chosen to ride one, in full knowledge that they could be skidding sideways to their death at any moment. But why make it so hard? When do you ever need to slalom inbetween cones in real life? I'm pretty sure if you were ever cought doing this on the street you'd get pulled over for dangerous driving. By gum C70 was a beast  Black Dog (17/06/2009)
The learner laws also allowed you to ride a bike of unlimited capacity provided it had a sidecar attached. Plenty of people I knew bought an old BSA 650 or Norton, stuck a chair on, and that was it. There was even a very racy thing called a Sidewinder, which was basically a frame with a wheel on it which was hinged to the bike frame - technically a sidecar, but you could lean it. It looked highly dangerous, but was legal. . This sounds rather comical! Black Dog (17/06/2009)
I take my hat off to the young bikers of today, with all the expense and hassle of the CBT and two-part test. As a 16/17 year old, I'm not sure I could have afforded it or even been bothered - especially as there were things a young man could do in a car that were pretty much impossible on a bike. And I'm not talking about smoking. It does seem rather hard. I'm sure the government is determined to make us all use public tansport as its "cheaper". The only thing is the current population on theroad isn't getting any younger...
________________________________________________________________________ All you people who are just browsing, get registered and get chatting! We don't bite
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Being
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 9th February 2010 23:22
Posts: 637,
Visits: 1,167
|
|
| Good work, Trick. I'm impressed by your instructor as well: obviously a sensible bloke and some good advice there. Might also mention the new SHARP helmet tests - they're a little controversial, but provide a rating based on more extensive testing than the EU minimum. Surprisingly, a lot of cheaper helmets (sub-£150) do quite well in comparison to some real flagship (£300-400+) models...which is part of the source of controversy. And make sure that, whatever standard and price range you go for, it fits properly in all dimensions: that is, in its' own way, at least as important as the build quality. The two-part test and the reduction from 250 to 125cc for learners came in in 82/83, just before I was old enough to ride. But my full car license entitled me at 17 to ride any kind of moped (including unrestricted FS1Es etc) without L plates and was a permanent provisional bike license for up to 125cc, no CBT required to ride on the road. Not too bad, really, and like BD I just rode thousands of miles (on my Honda H100) until I was ready to take the test. (Although when I found out how much easier and smoother a bigger four-stroke multi was to control, I rather wished I'd gone for it a bit earlier)! The actual test was a few questions first, then an observed ride. Early days of one-way helmet-to-helmet radio, with added static, so it was an utter gamble whether you got any of the directions right - luckily it wasn't a fail to go the wrong way. Pretty much every instruction from the examiner consisted of: "At the end of the road ***hiss***crackle***". I still have no idea whether we stuck to the approved route from the first corner onwards! Sidewinders were fantastic things: suicidal, but fantastic. Not terribly clear from the pic, but it was just a weighted wheel on a stick, with a swivel joint to allow it to fold up: 
Have to say, I think the roads are more dangerous now and it is of benefit to have increased the level of pre-road training and the stringency of the testing. Up to a point. It could have been implemented an awful lot more simply and the costs are outrageous (integrated transport policy at work: zero encouragement to get people on to two wheels. What a surprise: New Labour failed on yet another manifesto promise). I also think that the point has been reached where additional training in the vacuum of a non-real situation doesn't really achieve anything - at some stage, you just have to get out there and play with the traffic to learn how to deal with it. The new "swerve" test seems a little harsh, too (as well as not particularly realistic), but rumour has it it's been responsible for a number of broken limbs and a lot more dropped bikes...especially if you're unlucky enough to be doing part 1 in the rain. Rather than being allowed to slow down for conditions, the manoeuvre has to be carried out at 50kph+, with not much braking distance after the swerve. Result: inexperienced riders jam the brakes on before straightening up and kiss their front wheel goodbye. Thirty years from now, we'll be the only proper road users. Everybody else will be chauffered around by electronically-guided vehicles with full collision avoidance systems and more safety interlocks than the space shuttle. Bikes may come with 'em, but I bet we'll be the only people figuring out ways to disconnect them and get on with riding...
>> ex silens nox noctis <<
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Being
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 21st November 2009 09:38
Posts: 1,001,
Visits: 1,789
|
|
And amen to that!
--
2003 ST1300 Pan Euro
1995 Yam XT600E
http://goingfastgettingnowhere.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Being
      
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 15th January 2010 12:31
Posts: 93,
Visits: 277
|
|
| Really good trick, reading that made me remember my CBT a few years ago, wow it's gone quick. I have to say I like your choice of bike (I had a SR too & I loved it!). I paid about £300-400 for my DAS when I did it 4/5 years ago. But as the others have said it is worth it, there is only 2 of you & the instructor. Your out all day bar lunch & you do learn lots from it. I did the 4 days & 5th day was quick chill out ride & then out for the test. I never knew some of those muscles existed until I felt the pain of riding for 5 days solid all day. Thankfully you harden up. I never thought I'd be able to cope with the weight of the GN but it's wierd how quickly you get used to the new weight & it's never too long until you're pushing it about like it's nothing. Good for keeping your arms in shape too! Plus why have 4 wheels when 2 are so much more fun, and better than public transport. I still love the fact that when I drive to our other office in Worthing (3 times this week) I can filter through all the traffic.
|
|
|
|